Category Archives: Uncategorized

Organic Patents now on Facebook.

I created an “Organic Patents” Facebook page.

https://www.facebook.com/OrganicPatents/

UPSTO’s Patent Term Caclulator

Draw-ahead feature for chemical structure drawing applications

PerkinElmer Informatics, Inc. patented a “Draw-ahead feature for chemical structure drawing applications.”

Albeit usefull at times, I often turn off the type-ahead / Quick-Type feature on my iPhone to prevent embarasing errors. I would likely turn off a draw-ahead feature just in case too.

August 18, 2017

JULY-2017 USPTO REPORT: PATENT ELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER

August 8, 2017

PATENT ELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER: REPORT ON VIEWS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC

Updating the “Boilerplate Definitions” Page

I’ve added a few more definitions to my “Sample Boilerplate definitions page.”

As always, it is a work in progress.

SCOTUS Opinion on Patent Exhaustion

June 2, 2017

The Supreme Court Tuesday issued its decision on patent exhaustion on Tuesday May 30, 2017. (Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.)

Below are a few blog posts for reading.

Supreme Court Holds Patent Exhaustion is Not Limited to U.S. Sales

Supreme Court Holds that Any Sale of a Patented Product Exhausts Patent Holder’s Rights

U.S. Supreme Court Significantly Restricts Patent Owners’ Ability to Control Resale of Patented Items

Postdoc sues Harvard

The chemist alleges that he was left off of a patent for cortistatin A derivatives. Merck licensed the patent from Harvard for $20M.

Let’s see how this shakes out.

C&EN Article:

http://cen.acs.org/articles/95/web/2017/05/Researcher-sues-Harvard-for-drug-royalties.html

Cortistatin_A_

VIMPAT® (lacosamide) Patent Survives IPR Challenge

April 25, 2017

The PTAB upheld the validity of Patent RE38,551 E (“the ’551 patent”), which covers VIMPAT® (lacosamide).

See PTAB Litigation Blog by Jones Day, LLP: “Pharmaceutical Compound Nonobvious Absent Evidence Suggesting Specific Modification to Prior Art Compound”

Patent-Related Notes from C&EN

April – 2017

Syngenta says a U.S. district court has found that the agrochemical maker Willowood infringed two Syngenta patents relating to the fungicide azoxystrobin. Damages for the infringement will be assessed at a trial later this year.

Solvay won a patent infringement lawsuit in China:

Solvay has won a patent infringement lawsuit in China against the Yantai-based firm Sunshow Specialty Chemical. The suit involved an ultraviolet stabilizer for thermoplastic olefins produced by Solvay’s Cytec Industries subsidiary.

10% of NIH Grants Directly Lead to Patents

According to Science (2017, DOI: 10.1126/science.aal0010), 10% of NIH Grants Directly Lead to Patents. Meanwhile, 30% of NIH grants are cited in patent applictions. (See “By the numbers” – C&EN, 2017, 95 (14), pp 21–21April 3, 2017.)

The applied value of public investments in biomedical research

Abstract

Scientists and policy-makers have long argued that public investments in science have practical applications. Using data on patents linked to U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants over a 27-year period, we provide a large-scale accounting of linkages between public research investments and subsequent patenting. We find that about 10% of NIH grants generate a patent directly but 30% generate articles that are subsequently cited by patents. Although policy-makers often focus on direct patenting by academic scientists, the bulk of the effect of NIH research on patenting appears to be indirect. We also find no systematic relationship between the “basic” versus “applied” research focus of a grant and its propensity to be cited by a patent.

Organic Patents®

A WordPress site dedicated to Patents and Organic Chemistry