Organic Patents®

A WordPress site dedicated to Patents and Organic Chemistry

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • Enablement
  • Obviousness
    • Cases from the CAFC & PTAB on Small-Molecule Obviousness
    • Obviousness of Chemical Processes
    • Obviousness of Stereoisomers & Purified Compounds
  • Patent Eligibility
  • DISCLAIMER
  • Boilerplate Definitions

UPSTO’s Patent Term Caclulator

USPTO patent_term_calculator

Share:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized on September 28, 2017 by David Rucando.

Post navigation

← Cabazitaxel Method Claims Unpatentable Organic Patents now on Facebook. →

Categories

  • Case Law (35)
  • Uncategorized (26)
  • Education (4)
  • Interesting Patents (4)
  • Patent Prosecution (4)

Tags

  • Case Law (19)
  • CAFC (17)
  • Federal Circuit (13)
  • PTAB (12)
  • Obviousness (10)

Year

  • 2024 (2)
  • 2023 (11)
  • 2021 (1)
  • 2019 (4)
  • 2018 (2)

Links

  • ACS-Chemistry & The Law
  • US Patent & Trademark Office
  • Patently-O
  • PatentDocs
  • PharmaPatents Blog

Recent Posts

  • SCHRÖDINGER’S POLYMORPH: WHEN A CRYSTALLINE FORM CLAIM IS OBVIOUS AND INVALID
  • NESACS Advances in Chemical Sciences Symposium
  • 10-Month Rule: Federally Funded Provisional Patent Applications
  • Inherency & Therapeutic Mechanisms: Reviewing In re Couvaras – (With No-Frills Diagrams)

Archives

Categories

  • Case Law
  • Chemistry
  • Deals
  • Education
  • Fun Facts
  • FYI
  • Interesting Patents
  • Patent Prosecution
  • SCOTUS
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • Uncategorized
  • USPTO

Contact

david@organicpatents.com

Proudly powered by WordPress
Go to mobile version
Verified by MonsterInsights