Skip to content

Organic Patents®

A WordPress site dedicated to Patents and Organic Chemistry

  • Home
  • About
  • Enablement
  • Obviousness
    • Cases from the CAFC & PTAB on Small-Molecule Obviousness
    • Obviousness of Chemical Processes
    • Obviousness of Stereoisomers & Purified Compounds
  • Patent Eligibility
  • DISCLAIMER
  • Boilerplate Definitions

Updating the “Boilerplate Definitions” Page

I’ve added a few more definitions to my “Sample Boilerplate definitions page.”

As always, it is a work in progress.

Share:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Patent Lexicography: When “Branched Alkyl” ≠ “Branched Alkyl” – A Cautionary Tale
    Date
    April 6, 2026
    In relation to
    CAFC
  • When is and “and?” When is and “or?”
    Date
    May 12, 2017
    In relation to
    Case Law
This entry was posted in Uncategorized on July 17, 2017 by David Rucando.

Post navigation

← Canada’s Supreme Court strengthened patent protection for brand-named-drug makers Velcade® Patent Validated by CAFC →

Links

  • ACS-Chemistry & The Law
  • US Patent & Trademark Office
  • Patently-O
  • PatentDocs
  • PharmaPatents Blog

Recent Posts

  • Patent Lexicography: When “Branched Alkyl” ≠ “Branched Alkyl” – A Cautionary Tale
  • Updated Reference for Protecting Groups
  • Reference for Pharmaceutical Formulations
  • SCHRÖDINGER’S POLYMORPH: WHEN A CRYSTALLINE FORM CLAIM IS OBVIOUS AND INVALID

Archives

Categories

  • CAFC
  • Case Law
  • Chemistry
  • Deals
  • Education
  • Fun Facts
  • FYI
  • Interesting Patents
  • Patent Prosecution
  • SCOTUS
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • Uncategorized
  • USPTO

Contact

contact@organicpatents.com

Proudly powered by WordPress
Exit mobile version