Skip to content

Organic Patents®

A WordPress site dedicated to Patents and Organic Chemistry

  • Home
  • About
  • Enablement
  • Obviousness
    • Cases from the CAFC & PTAB on Small-Molecule Obviousness
    • Obviousness of Chemical Processes
    • Obviousness of Stereoisomers & Purified Compounds
  • Patent Eligibility
  • DISCLAIMER
  • Boilerplate Definitions

Janssen’s Remicade Patent Invalid According to Massachusetts Court

Leave a reply
Massachusetts Federal district court ruled that Janssen Biotech, Inc.’s US Patent No. 6,284,471 for Remicade (infliximab) is invalid. Janssen will appeal to the CAFC.

“Janssen loses patent fight over arthritis drug“

“Celltrion, Hospira receive favourable ruling from Massachusetts court on Remicade patent; J&J to appeal“

Share:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • If you get a restriction requirement, then use it to file divisionals.
    Date
    January 29, 2018
    In relation to
    Case Law
  • Idenix v. Gilead: Split CAFC Panel at Least Agrees – Valid or Not, Either Way it’s Idenix Loss – Claims Too Broad
    Date
    February 4, 2023
    In relation to
    Case Law
  • Correcting an Enantiomer without Invalidating a Patent is Possible
    Date
    February 2, 2017
    In relation to
    Case Law
This entry was posted in Case Law and tagged CAFC, Remicade on August 30, 2016 by David Rucando.

Post navigation

← New Blawg! Amerigen and Alembic petition to join Mylan’s IPR arguing that patent claims covering Toviaz® are obvious over Detrol® →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Links

  • ACS-Chemistry & The Law
  • US Patent & Trademark Office
  • Patently-O
  • PatentDocs
  • PharmaPatents Blog

Recent Posts

  • Patent Lexicography: When “Branched Alkyl” ≠ “Branched Alkyl” – A Cautionary Tale
  • Updated Reference for Protecting Groups
  • Reference for Pharmaceutical Formulations
  • SCHRÖDINGER’S POLYMORPH: WHEN A CRYSTALLINE FORM CLAIM IS OBVIOUS AND INVALID

Archives

Categories

  • CAFC
  • Case Law
  • Chemistry
  • Deals
  • Education
  • Fun Facts
  • FYI
  • Interesting Patents
  • Patent Prosecution
  • SCOTUS
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • Uncategorized
  • USPTO

Contact

contact@organicpatents.com

Proudly powered by WordPress
Exit mobile version